![]() ![]() The lawsuit is a reminder that more than a decade ago, anti-virus companies began flagging some applications as PUPs. But the company announced Thursday that it plans to appeal the decision in the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. ![]() (Source: Enigma Software's complaint)Įnigma Software didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. District Court." Enigma Software sued Malwarebytes for flagging two of its software applications as potentially unwanted software. Kleczynski adds: "As PUPs became more prevalent and problematic, we began offering protection against them too, a choice that is now backed by the U.S. In the wake of Judge Davila's decision, Malwarebytes CEO Marcin Kleczynski says in a blog post that while the decision might sound mundane, "the reality is that this is not only a critical win for Malwarebytes, but for all security providers who will continue to have legal protection to do what is right for their users." The lawsuit was settled earlier this year and Bleeping Computer excised the review from its site. Enigma sued Bleeping Computer in 2016 after it posted a negative review of SpyHunter. That separate lawsuit involved the online technology forum Bleeping Computer. ![]() Enigma Software's complaint against Malwarebytes.Įnigma Software accused Malwarebytes of illegally classifying two of its applications as "potentially unwanted programs" or PUPs for short: an anti-malware program called SpyHunter and a program designed to clean hard drives and Windows registries called RegHunter.Įnigma contended that Malwarebytes intended to interfere with its customer base and retaliate against the company "for a separate lawsuit Enigma filed against a Malwarebytes affiliate."
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |